Lima, Peru | Friday 05 September 2008 22:17 | |
![]() |
| The path of the Interoceanic Highway crossing the Andes-Amazon wilderness, which has the highest concentration of Protected Areas in the tropics |
| © Heinz Plenge |
# Juan Blake says :
26 July, 2007 [ 16:38 ]
Elevation is the key for critical areas no doubt. Take the Alaskan Pipe Line as an example. In some of the more critical areas of wild life such as the Brook Range, it has worked quite well. The support columns are insulated from the flow of oil to prevent the permafrost from melting, thus insuring the safety of the structure and all the wildlife around it. All these years later though, you never hear about this from the radical commie enviros. All we hear about is death & distruction for all. We can still protect our enviroment & not have to sacrifice commerce as this artical points out in a very good way. Those Green Peace morons need to read Ms. Pitman's article.
# Kyle S. says :
26 July, 2007 [ 17:15 ]
You know something, when Green Peace first started out years ago, a lot of people were in touch with their concern for wild life and nature. But man have they turned into a bunch of cookoo's over the years! I guess communism is a good discript for them. Lets outlaw weedeaters, lawn mowers, BBQ pits, lead amunition, and so on. The Sierra Club folks are even worse than Green Peace as far as I'm concerned.
# Jason W. Smith, Ph.D. says :
26 July, 2007 [ 19:24 ]
I think we can all agree that this freeway needs to be built, soon and properly (no matter what the cost.) I can testify as an oilman that there is no inherent need to destroy any environmental treasures because of development. I spent years working offshore in the Gulf of Mexico both north (US) and south (Mexico) and I can tell you that there have never been cleaner waters than those around our rigs.
Working on land is more complex for many reasons but we have much experience in North America allowing us (you) to do this work safely.
Probably nothing is more important at this time than the infrastructure of roads, waterways, airstrips and of course superhighways to the Bolivarian industrialization and mechanization of South America.
You may add my name to your list of petitioners.
# souza says :
27 July, 2007 [ 13:47 ]
Let's fight against interoceanic highway.
It will destroy our rainforest.
Brasil isn't a good example of rainforest protection , that country does not care about it.
# Realista says :
14 July, 2008 [ 19:44 ]
Add your comment
This highway is vital for the economic development of an isolated region of Peru, the poorest southern portion of the country. It is also to be followed by electrification, water works, and refrigeration for food preservation. It is the way out of land lockedness for Bolivia, and a way for developing the economy of millions of isolated people with needs, from medical to help during the new weather changes which kills thousands of people in currently inaccessible areas. To change the design of the highway or to stop it you must provide all the services that this highway will provide for the people of the region, as well as money to change the way it is being built. In the US you print money that is accepted worldwide and gows with the world,s economy; here in Peru that recognisable money is scarse, and has to be earned by providing goods and services. So be realistic about the third world and put the money to back up the words. Thank-you
News web syndication [RSS]
what is "web syndication" ?