Lima, Peru | Monday 01 December 2008 18:01 | |
"The markup comes at a particularly critical time. With the collapse of the Doha Round, the time has come for an important change in focus. If we cannot make progress with trading partners in the World Trade Organization, then we should look to trading partners – like Peru – that are willing to move forward with us in agriculture, industrial products, services, and other areas".
"This agreement has great potential. For agriculture producers, the Peru agreement is one of the best trade agreements that the U.S. Trade Representative has negotiated. It immediately eliminates tariffs on roughly two-thirds of current U.S. agriculture exports (..) It also treats sugar in an appropriately sensitive way, and in this respect serves as a model for future trade agreements.
Nevertheless, Members have significant concerns about this agreement. We must address them.
On beef, Peru must abide by the commitments that it made to open its market to U.S. beef. I am pleased that Peru has made progress since our hearing last month (..) but has fallen short of its promises. Peru still bans all forms of U.S. beef from cattle more than 30 months of age. It is hard to contemplate approving an agreement when our trading partner has already proven itself unwilling to live up to trade commitments it has made.
On labor, the buck may stop with Peru. Peru has made great strides to address concerns that have been expressed about its labor regime. But it has become more difficult for Senators to understand why the labor chapter alone remains static even when our trading partner is willing to go further.
I hope that we can work together to address these concerns and reach a point where the Peru agreement can attract broader support on this Committee and in the Congress. "
News web syndication [RSS]
what is "web syndication" ?